7 comments

  • canada_dry 17 minutes ago
    Orwell never even envisioned this form of state surveillance!
  • PhunkyPhil 28 minutes ago
    It's no secret they've been tracking people's faces as much as they can.

    The morning of Pretti I was on Lyndale and there were two men wearing "press" jackets with DLSRs taking pictures of people's faces in the crowd. They were eventually recognized and yelled out, but it was quite an unnerving feeling.

  • tokai 41 minutes ago
    But aren't they still resisting wearing body cameras?
    • tencentshill 32 minutes ago
      These will probably not count as body cams for some reason, so will be subject to different regulations, or none at all.
  • LightBug1 21 minutes ago
    Perfect addition to any self-respecting Junior Stasi outfit ...
  • josefritzishere 43 minutes ago
    Your tax dollars, hard at work.
  • bediger4000 11 minutes ago
    This smells like a way to funnel money to someone. There's no way a small number of "Smart Glasses" will be cheap, and the warlord(s) in charge can spec it in ways to increase costs, funnelling even more money to that someone. Classic US grifting from the government, in my judgement. We should find out who made this decision, and it will be interesting to see who gets the contract(s) for it. As we've seen with DoD acquisition, even a failed program can keep the money spigot open for years, too.
  • vamos_davai 19 minutes ago
    I'm not a fan of surveillance state, but I'm also not a fan of high crime and false arrests. If we're just tying up the police and having bloated budgets, we should get rid of publicly funded police and allow police to be a corporate benefit like healthcare.
    • pickleglitch 7 minutes ago
      Isn't that a key plot point of Robocop?

      But seriously, it's a great idea. I mean, just look how well healthcare as a corporate benefit has worked out!