I have a copy and like it much. However, i was always partial to Frege's Begriffschrift. His notation was really creative. It's a shame Russel's deflation of that project has sentenced it to the rubbish heap of history.
If you can read this book cover-to-cover, you're an absolute hero. Sometimes I wonder if they inserted a big logical error in the middle just to troll people under the assumption nobody would bother to read it.
I read GEB cover to cover and haven’t stopped thinking about it for years. Not a brag, a nudge that it’s not impenetrable and more people should read it.
I used to wonder how likely it was that the printers made some typesetting errors. Who among us could, say, type a thousand pages of APL symbols without introducing a bug?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introduction_to_Mathematical_P...
and for ease of reading see the various PDF versions at:
https://people.umass.edu/klement/imp/
More seriously, there is indeed a huge logical error at the heart of the whole enterprise but it was not discovered until much later by Kurt Gödel.
Which leads us to our next impenetrable book, Gödel, Escher, Bach by Douglas Hofstadter.
It's also pretty typically a part of History Of Mathematics and Philosophy of Mathematics courses.
No it wasn't.
And you did not read it.